EVIL ELITES CONCOCT DASTARDLY PLAN TO DESTROY ALT-RIGHT BY BOOSTING SPENCER EGO

The establishment has tried to do everything in their power to bring the Alt-Right to its knees, unleashing hordes of antifa and callous cops against us at Charlottesville, shutting down large parts of the internet, and even attempting to override the First Amendment. All have failed. But now they have launched a new attack, this one much more dangerous because it is cunning and subtle, and works on the psychological plane.

On Monday (16th), in an unprecedented move, the state of Florida declared a state of emergency, not for a hurricane or an earthquake, nor for a mass race riot or an outbreak of the Plague, but simply because Richard Spencer has been invited to speak at the University of Florida on Thursday (19th). As reported by the NY Post:

'Gov. Rick Scott made the move on Monday, issuing an executive order as officials prepared to deal with the fallout from Spencer’s speaking engagement. 'I find that the threat of a potential emergency is imminent and hereby declare a state of emergency in Alachua County,' Scott wrote in the order.'

To call a state of emergency in this way and talk about 'fallout' as if they were dealing with a nuclear explosion is practically the same as elevating Richard Spencer to 'godhood,' making him seem much bigger and more scary than he really is -- practically a force of divine nature at whose approach a whole state trembles. 

Naturally, such a move can be expected to have some effect on the ego of someone even as modest and self-effacing as Spencer. What we have here, therefore, is an attempt at psychological assassination, a vile attempt to send Spencer's ego soaring through the roof, so that his hitherto sane and balanced character will change in ways harmful to the Alt-Right.

The evil psy-op operatives behind this scheme must be calculating that boosting Spencer's self-esteem in this underhanded way will push him 'over the edge,' rather in the same way that Caligula's elevation to the Imperial throne of Rome in 37AD served to unhinge the formerly mild-mannered Roman youth. 

No doubt their intention is for Spencer to alienate the foot soldiers of the Alt-Right by demanding to be carried from university to university in a 'Milo Chair,' demand human sacrifice and his pick of all the virgins at all future NPI conferences, and to finally declare himself the reincarnation of Heliogalabulus, the Sacred Child of the Sun. In the days ahead, Richard will need all his fortitude and legendary humility to see off this challenge.

This is what those sick bastards actually want to do to Richard Spencer and the Alt-Right.

COWARDLY KURDS KICKED OUT OF KIRKUK

The Iraqi army on a roll. 

Kirkuk is probably the most important city for the Kurds. Not only is it in the midst of major oilfields that supply over half the revenue of the Kurdish autonomous region in Northern Iraq, but it is the starting point for the Kirkuk-Banias Pipeline that connects these oilfields to the Mediterranean. Also, it is the only point connecting roads leading to the other two major Kurdish cities, Erbil and Sulaymaniyah. 

So, you would think the Kurds would at least make some effort to hold onto to it. Especially in the wake of their referendum, when the majority of people in the Kurdish controlled zone voted for independence. Quite simply, without Kirkuk, an independent Kurdistan is incredibly difficult.

Instead, a mere 48 hours after Baghdad launched a sudden but quite predictable offensive, the city has fallen entirely into Iraqi hands, with the Kurdish 'Peshmerga' forces literally turning tail and fleeing like a flock of sheep. For comparison, look at the case of Raqqah, a smaller town, where besieged ISIS forces with much less support, held out for almost 5 months, or Deir ez-Zor, where Syrian forces resisted an ISIS siege lasting years.

As reported by the Jerusalem Post, which seems quite upset about the whole thing:

'Overnight, confusion along the front line between the Iraqis and Peshmerga of the Kurdistan Regional Government led to clashes which destroyed several vehicles and a chaotic situation. By morning groups of Kurdish forces had abandoned their posts, some due to a prior local agreement. In the afternoon scenes of defeat were everywhere, with black Humvees of the Iraqi counterterrorism forces surrounding a famous statue to Peshmerga at the entrance to the city and thousands of Kurds fleeing in their cars towards Erbil and Sulaymaniyah.'

This is all rather strange and leads to a lot of speculation. Here is a short list of possibilities:

1. The Kurds were weaker than most analysts estimated, possibly because large numbers of them were sent to Syria to serve as proxies for the US in its war against ISIS.
2. The Iraqis were stronger than most analysts estimated, possibly because of military assistance from the US, Turkey, or Iran. 
3. The Kurds were simply told to get out of Kirkuk by the Americans or else face isolation and the cutting off of all support. The US finds the prospect of Kurdish independence deeply 'embarrassing' to its overall position in the region. 
4. One Kurdish group betrayed the other, either for its own reasons or to gain favour with the Iraqis or Americans. The Kurdish army, called the Peshmerga, is bascially made up of two rival militia groups controlled by the Democratic Party of Kurdistan and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. 
5. Units of the Peshmerga were simply bribed to back off and allow the Iraqis to advance. There is some evidence of this.

One other possibility is that they had too many women in combat positions, as this has always been one of the ways that the Kurds have sold themselves to Western audiences. While this is great PR to gain international support, it can backfire in actual combat situations. 

This may have been happening when the Iraqis launched their offensive.

Well, let's wait and see what the real story is here. Should be interesting.

GAY JEWISH MAN LEAVES NATIONAL FRONT BECAUSE ITS NOT NAZI ENOUGH

A man who liked dressing up in brown shirts and lederhosen, and posing with swastikas and Nazi crap, has turned out to be not only gay but also Jewish, effectively ticking both boxes of the majority of those who like LARPing as (((Nazis))). 

The man in question is Kevin Wilshaw, formerly a member of the National Front, a British nationalist party that was heavily infiltrated by government spies and destabilised from within, with the help of LARPers like Wilshaw, who helped to provide the kind of 'bad optics' that put 'normies' off voting in their own best interests, and allowed mass immigration and multiculturalism in Britain to reach toxic levels. 

Wilshaw shows his strange, gay, Jewish fetish to a
 journalist looking for 'bad optics' to smear nationalists.

The revelations were made after Wilshaw renounced the party he had helped sabotage in an attempt to climb on the 'anti-nationalism' gravy train. 

Wilshaw was a National Front organiser in the 1980s and was still active earlier this year when he would speak at events. 

He said he is disowning the movement and leaving the National Front because, as a gay, Jewish, he simply doesn't feel the party is Nazi enough for his tastes anymore. 

Gay and Jewish men have a long history of being strongly attracted to (((Nazi LARPy))) stuff and any groups or parties that indulge this strange fetish. This even goes back to the original Nazis who were riddled with gays, while later (((Neo-Nazi))) movements, which were often designed to discredit White nationalism, had more than their fair share of Jews, which still surprises a lot of normies.

Just a few examples -- there are many more:

Ernst Rohm: Gay

Frank Collin: Jewish

Dan Burros (Centre): Jewish

Nicky Crane: Gay

Always remember the golden rule: the more Naziish it is, the more gay and Jewish it is likely to be, and vice versa.  

In this day and age, (((Nazi LARPers))) and Nazi stuff only exist for one reason alone, namely to smear and sabotage the healthy and moral nationalism of White people and Europeans, and to stop them expressing their legitimate interests. Don't fall into this trap -- unless of course you are gay and Jewish. Then you'll be as happy as a pig in muck.

BLACK MARKET IN MIGRANT DOCUMENTS BOOMS IN GERMANY

Migrants and refugees in Germany have been going into business for themselves, selling and renting out their German residency and healthcare cards.

German investigative journalists looking into the scams uncovered secret Facebook groups where migrants already with ID documents passed them on -- at a price -- to would-be migrants, allowing them to enter the country easily and then access free healthcare and other welfare benefits.

The investigators Journalisten Watch got access to the secretive Facebook groups, where mainly Muslim users contacted each other to get round German immigration and welfare laws.

Journalisten Watch said:

'Entire families are now legally travelling to Germany because they can use real papers and even go directly to the doctor. Since they are real papers, neither entry nor treatment is denied.'

One comment they reported read: 

'I need a German passport for refugees, born in 1998, preferably stamped from Sudan.' 

This got a reply from another user that said she has, 'a German passport with year of birth 1997 including head cover.' This is a reference to Islamic headscarves which make Muslim women appear generally similar to overworked immigration authorities.

Other users were exchanging advice on the best way to travel to Germany, and enter the country in order to get its much coveted welfare benefits. Another comment explained that documents going missing was not a problem, as the authorities would simply re-issue replacements without delay.

'I simply say I lost the card and then get a new one immediately.'

Official figures, reported by the German newspaper Bild, said there were 564,000 asylum seekers eligible for German unemployment benefits in March this year. That number looks set to grow. 

WORLD NOW QUESTIONING WHY UNIVERSITIES EVEN EXIST AFTER SPENCER VISIT TO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

One thing that came out of Richard Spencer's speaking trip to the University of Florida was the fact that universities are clearly not intellectual centres anymore. 

Spencer was greeted by a crowd of zombie leftists who literally held up signs as retarded as these:

Meanwhile inside the auditorium, the 'intellectual elite' of the student body gathered to chant repetitive slogans in an attempt to disrupt Spencer's speech, slogans such as 'Spencer go home,' 'Fuck You,' and 'Black Lives Matter,' while Spencer and Mike Enoch, who was also present, mocked them.

Then there was the Q&A section, which could have been an ideal opportunity for brainy university kids to use logic and data to tie Spencer in knots if his ideas had been in any way wrong. So, what challenging questions did they send Spencer's way?

• How can you say the white race is beautiful when you're so ugly? 
• How did it feel to get punched in the face?
• Do you believe the things that come out of your mouth?
• How will you differentiate between different ethnicites?

This last one was probably the pick of the crop, as it was supposed to undermine the whole concept of significant racial differences by calling attention to the fact that some people don't fit neatly into racial categories. But this is exactly like saying it's silly to have categories of height and weight simply because some people aren't tall or fat.  

So, even this was pretty retarded, especially as non-Whites have no problem about belonging to 'imperfect racial categories.' I mean does anyone ever say '25% White Lives Matter' instead of 'Black Lives Matter'? Because that's about how white American Blacks are according to genetic data. 

But this fatuous query was the high point of the anti-Spencer challenge. For the most part, the event consisted of Richard Spencer talking over people like this:

So what is wrong with what used to be called our 'institutions of higher learning'?

Maybe it's because too large a proportion of the population is now encouraged to go to these places, or maybe it's all the 'affirmative action,' or it could be the 'feels cult' of Leftism, along with the absence of healthy market forces at these non-competitive institutions. 

But, whatever the reason is, it is clear that universities have become so dumbed down that there is practically no reason for them to exist anymore, except as daycare centres for the mentally damaged and the emotionally incontinent. But surely this could be done much more cheaply and efficiently using some other method, like giving them drugs or cat toys. 


Watch the full speech here:

NEW ZEALAND NATIONALISTS FORM COALITION WITH THE LEFT

Winston Peters - between the races, between the parties.

We've said it again and again: the Alt-Right is beyond the conventional left and right division. What we believe in are healthy organic entities -- families, communities, and countries. Modern 'business friendly' conservatism, with its globalist neoliberal tendencies, can be just as toxic as extreme Leftism and Cultural Marxism.

So, we are not surprised to see the populist and nationalist New Zealand First Party decide to enter a coalition government with the Centre-Left Labour Party and the Green Party, although purely tactical and party reasons no doubt also played their part.

Following the general election, which was held on the 23rd of September, the New Zealand First Party got 7.2% of the vote and won 9 seats. Along with other results, this meant that it held the balance of power in the 120-seat parliament, with the Centre-Right National Party getting 56 seats and the Labour and Green parties getting 46 and 8 respectively. 

Following the full count, New Zealand First, which strongly opposes mass immigration, entered into negotiations with both the National Party and the Labour-Green grouping, before deciding to go with the Leftists. 

Party Leader Winston Peters, who is part Maori, explained his party's decision in somewhat garbled terms as follows:

'The agreement we have reached is a summation of the policies that survived the negotiations.  As the song says, 'You can’t always get what you want.' Our negotiations have taken place against a backdrop of changing international and internal economic circumstances which we cannot ignore. We in New Zealand First believe that an economic correction, or a slowdown, is looming, and that the first signs are already here. [snip] Our choice today relates to how best we mitigate, not worsen, their  impact on as many New Zealanders as possible. [snip] Far too many New Zealanders have come to view today’s capitalism, not as their friend, but as their foe. And they are not all wrong. That is why we believe that capitalism must regain its responsible - its human face. That perception has influenced our negotiations.'

A major reason that New Zealand First went with Labour and the Greens, however, was also tactical and aimed at preserving the strength of the party. 

If New Zealand First remain to the right of the National Party on a political spectrum that favours centrist parties, there is a tendency for its supporters to see elections in terms of a bi-partisan Centre-Left vs. Centre-Right split, and so vote for the main party on the 'right,' namely the National Party. At this election New Zealand First actually lost a few seats. 

Moving to the Left, however, allows the party to disrupt the 'polarity,' and get voters to express their preferences more directly, which benefits its stronger policy positions.

Another problem New Zealand First faced in the past when it was in coalition with the Centre-Right National Party was defections by its own MPs to the larger party. Allying with the Left may make this less of a problem.


Addendum

After further negotiations, Labour and the NZ First agreed to cut immigration from 70,000 a year to 40,000. NZ First want to cap it at under 10,000.

MEME UPDATE

COLIN LIDDELL: LONDON PRACTICALLY UNPOLICEABLE THANKS TO TOXIC MIX OF PC AND MULTICULTURALISM

What happens when one of the great cities of the World loses its mojo and starts to turn into a Third World hellhole?

London has passed another milestone on its descent into Third World barbarism. New crime figures show that the minority White city (if you count illegals) is now much more violent and dangerous than New York City, with much higher rates of rape, robbery, and violent assault.

London and New York have equivalent populations of around 8 million people, but you are six times more likely to be burgled in the British capital, one and a half times more likely to be a robbery victim, and three times more likely to be raped. You also have a high probability of having your face liquidized by an acid attack, as London can now claim to be the “acid attack capital of the World.”

New York still has a small lead in actual murders, but London is fast catching up.

Different theories have been offered as to why crime is skyrocketing in the city. President Trump connected it to Islamic terrorism, tweeting, “Just out report: ‘United Kingdom crime rises 13% annually amid spread of Radical Islamic terror.’ Not good, we must keep America safe! Others have said it is due to poor policing. New York and London both spend around £3 billion a year on policing, employ around 30,000 officers, and have lots of crime-prone racial minorities, but New York is clearly managing the situation better.

The most likely explanation is that New York has a tradition of tough policing, thanks to previous administrations, while London is a cucked, PC city with a female Prime Minister, a Muslim mayor, and a lesbian in charge of its police force. Plus they have a lot less guns. No wonder the criminal underclass feel empowered.

London has installed a Muslim mayor to oversee its transition to third world hellhole status.

Also, while the NYPD used minor offences to harass, provoke, and arrest low IQ violent criminals with great success in the 1980s and 90s. London has taken the opposite approach, ignoring smaller crimes and instead focusing on high-profile, serious crimes.

This is because they can morally justify arresting or even shooting someone running around with a severed head, threatening to blow up a kindergarten, but feel it is “provocative” to crack down on hardened criminals for minor stuff, as this might lead to race riots. In 2011 large parts of the city were famously swept up in massive riots that included several large fires.

Read the rest of the article HERE.

ART SCULPTURE REMOVED BECAUSE IT UNWITTINGLY MOCKED MUSLIMS

Let's just put our cards straight on the table here. The French as a nation don't give a flying fuck about decency. This is the nation, remember, that placed the following painting in its art galleries in the 19th century, at a time when the rest of Europe was still getting hot and flustered over a glimpse of stocking:

Yes, the old, one-eyed hairy monster itself! In close up. And at a time when Queen Victoria was still on the throne. 

The French were also the nation who allowed an actual urinal to be venerated in their art galleries as an artwork. Were they taking the piss? You bet!

Then there was the massive buttplug by the Los Angeles 'artist' Paul McCarthy that they allowed to be 'erected' in one or the squares of Paris:

FFS, that thing could be seen from outer space -- or possibly Uranus, LOL! 

So, it's not like the French are ever coy or bashful about anything vulgar, disgusting, or connected to human bodily functions, waste matter, or sexual perversions, no matter how degenerate.

So it came as a surprise when the Louvre Museum actually refused to show a rather less explicit artwork than this by the Dutch-Jewish artist Joep van Lieshout on the spurious excuse that it was 'obscene.' 

The artwork in question, called 'Domestikator,' is more abstract than figurative. It stands 12 meters tall and looks vaguely like the figure of a human and an animal, with the human holding the animal 'affectionately' from behind. 

In this work it is clearly Van Lieshout's intention to 'suggest' that the human figure is fucking the animal. 

But, so what? Big deal! This is France after all -- a country of degenerates and perverts, where the President is a closet homosexual married to his ex-school teacher. 

Also, they are not big on animal welfare either, last time I checked.

So, why would this sculpture be any more of a problem than a giant buttplug or other, much worse works by Van Lieshout, like this disgustingly detailed anus-shape street bar that he came up with a few years ago that didn't cause any waves at the time?

There can only be one explanation for the Louvre's sudden unexpected timidity and diffidence, namely the growing power of France's Islamic community. 

While the Mullahs approve of the growing degeneracy of the native French, because it weakens them and prepares them for future conquest, they take a dim view of anything that might cast aspersions on their people, such as a giant statue that looks vaguely like a man fucking a goat or a sheep. 

This is because bestiality is extremely common in the countries of origin of Muslim migrants to France. I mean, just watch this video from Afghanistan and tell me how this isn't like a normal Saturday night out for these people.

Then there is this story we ran about some unfortunate Moroccan youths who caught something nasty from a sexually compliant donkey.

Whether one thinks it is justified or not, Muslims and animal sex has become a meme, so having this sculpture in front of the Louvre was definitely going to be 'provocative.' With dropping attendance due to fears of terrorism, you can see why the Museum cucked out.

Now Van Lieshout's sculpture will be shown at a much less prestigious and popular site, where any resultant terror attacks would only help destroy one of the ugliest buildings in the world -- namely the vile Pompidou Centre -- something for which any true art lover would thank the terrorists.

Van Lieshout and his monstrosity at their vile new setting.

MEME UPDATE

FRIVOLOUS POP STAR PULLS OUT OF SENATE RACE TO CONCENTRATE ON DRUGS AND GROUPIES

'White trash' rap-rocker, Kid Rock, has revealed that his Senate run was simply a big joke, and that he had no intention of becoming an elected US official.

The news broke when Rock appeared on Howard Stern’s SiriusXM radio show on Tuesday (24th).

'F

SUU KYI HONOURED FOR PROTECTING NATIONAL INTEGRITY OF MYANMAR

She love Myanmar long time...

Since she rose up from being a “bleeding heart” cause célèbre of Western shitlibs to being the actual leader of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi has made rapid progress as a stateswoman and protector of her native land. In recent weeks she has been supporting her nation’s security forces as they deal with the problem of the Rohingya, a largely alien Muslim population in the country’s North West that has been involved in violence against the native population.

Accordingly, she has now received the ultimate accolade for a former shitlib heroine who has done the right thing by defending her nation, namely having her name ceremoniously removed from the junior common room of a shitty, pozzed Oxford college.

A few years ago, Western liberals and leftists automatically assumed that Suu Kyi was “one of them” because she was (a) a woman, (b) non-White, (c) had married someone of a different race — an Englishman — and (d) was kept under house arrest in Rangoon by some tough guys in uniforms.

In fact, they were so sure that she was a fellow shitlib that a lot of Leftist universities went to the trouble of naming rooms after her, including the college of St Hugh’s, Oxford, where she had actually studied politics, philosophy, and economics before it was pozzed in the 1960s.

Shitlibs also campaigned for her to be given the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, and that doofus Bono even wrote a song celebrating her…um…heroism. Even funnier, it’s called “Walk On,” as in the Rohingya should “walk on” out the fuck of Myanmar, LOL. Even funnier, it has a line about packing a suitcase, ROFL.

Back when shitlibs were blowing smoke up her ass like this, she was frequently mentioned in Oscar winning speeches by cringy left-wing actors, gushing about what an “inspiration” she was, although, up to that time, she had done little except be the daughter of a famous dead politician and being placed under house arrest.

Anyway, since she became “1st State Counsellor of Myanmar,” which is basically like Prime Minister but with some “supervision” from the army, Suu Kyi has been showing what a great leader she really is by using her international moral capital to back up her state security forces in dealing with the Islamic threat posed by the Rohingya people.

This switch from imagined shitlib to actual ethnonationalist leader was entirely predictable, as all non-White people have strong tribal and identitarian instincts, and are genuinely baffled by the globalist, one-world bullshit that White liberal twats in the West manage to brainwash themselves into believing.

The Rohingya problem is routinely described in the Leftist media as a “humanitarian crisis” — cue furrowed brows and shots of crying children. But in a sense they are right, because any time you get millions of non-native Muslims brought into your country by alien elites you can be pretty sure that a lot of innocent people are going to suffer and die.

Oh, just another Buddhist monk butchered by your friendly neighbourhood Jihadis.

You also know that, if you do nothing about it and just allow the Muslim population to keep growing and radicalising, it is likely to generate some horrific genocidal conflict at some point in the future.

The majority of the Rohingya were originally brought into Myanmar by the British from neighbouring Bengal to serve as cheap labour and push down the wages of native Burmese. So it is high time that they returned to their natural ethnostate of Bangladesh.

Of course, being a great leader for your people and preventing future genocidal wars is something that pro-globalist White Leftist students can’t countenance. Hence the vote by the students of St Hugh’s College Oxford to effectively honour Suu Kyi by removing her name from their crappy junior common room, which will now probably be suitably renamed after some Muslim terrorist, anti-White racist, commie mass murderer, or sexual deviant.

The motion passed by the students unwittingly praised Suu Kyi for her skilful “silence and complicity” in her country’s defence of its national integrity by encouraging the Rohingya Muslims to return to their natural ethnostate. The motion incorrectly described this process as “ethnic cleansing,” completely forgetting about the real ethnic cleansing that was carried out when the Rohingya Bengalis moved in under the guns of the British, and pushed out the original Burmese inhabitants.

The colourfully worded St Hugh’s resolution read:

“Aung San Suu Kyi’s inability to condemn the mass murder, gang rape and severe human rights abuses in Rakhine is inexcusable and unacceptable. She has gone against the very principles and ideals she had once righteously promoted.”

This act of statesmanship by Suu Kyi was prompted by growing evidence that jihadi militants loyal to ISIS were active in the Rohingya community. Recently, ISIS militants also seized control of a city in another South East Asian country, the Philippines, where non-Muslims were butchered like sheep before the security services reestablished control.

So far around half a million Rohingya have successfully returned to their correct ethnostate, greatly enhancing the peace of the region.

KIWI NATIONALISM: FOREIGN HOUSE BUYERS TOLD TO SLING THEIR HOOK

Following the unlikely pairing of Winston Peters's nationalist New Zealand First Party and the centre-left Labour Party in a ruling coalition, following New Zealand's recent election, things are looking up for the island nation of 4.7 million, with more sensible policies making it into the mix.

The latest good news for ordinary New Zealanders is a new ban on oversees buyers purchasing homes. This will stop speculative foreign money flowing into the housing market and pushing up property and rental prices, which makes it harder for young New Zealanders to set up home. 

As reported by Yahoo News (Australia): 

'Overseas buyers will no longer be allowed to purchase existing homes in New Zealand, Prime Minister-elect Jacinda Ardern declared as she unveiled a raft of policy deals made with her coalition partners. The move to tackle soaring property prices was agreed during lengthy negotiations between the Labour Party leader and populist powerbroker Winston Peters to form a new government that also includes the Green Party.'

Since the new government took power, Ardern has also announced plans to slash immigration from 70,000 a year to 40,000, although Peters wants a 7,000-a-year cap. Responding to the news, Peters, who is set to be deputy PM and foreign minister in the new government, said the country is 'no longer for sale.'

'There is going to be a change and a clear signal sent internationally that New Zealand is no longer for sale in the way it has been. We're happy with that,' he said.

Much of the speculative money in the housing market comes from China and India, and also helps to fuel immigration.

The New Zealand political situation is well worth keeping an eye on as it shows how rising nationalist parties holding the balance of power can exert beneficial influence on their countries, a pattern we hope to see a lot more of in coming years. 

A case of the tail (Peters) wagging the dog (Ardern)?

HOLLYWOOD VAMPIRE: HARVEY THE BLOODSUCKER ...LITERALLY

With every revelation the Harvey Weinstein scandal keeps getting worse and worse. The latest disclosure paints the perverted Hollywood film producer as a literal bloodsucker, literally drinking the menstrual blood of his victim, Mimi Haleyi, a former production assistant, who was lured to the his New York apartment where he forced himself on her. 

As reported by Indiewire:

'The alleged sexual assault occurred after Weinstein returned from Paris. Haleyi says Weinstein invited her over to his SoHo apartment and she agreed in order to 'maintain a relationship.' When she arrived, she says Weinstein was 'all over me making sexual advances,' to which she continuously objected. Haleyi informed Weinstein that she was on her period and therefore there was 'no way' anything sexual was going to happen.

'He wouldn’t take no for an answer and backed me into a room which was not lit, but looked like a kid’s bedroom with drawings on the walls,' she said. 'He held me down on the bed, I tried to get him off of me but it was impossible. He was extremely persistent and physically overpowering.He then orally forced himself on me while I was on my period. He even pulled my tampon out. I was in disbelief. I would not have wanted anyone to do that with me even if the person had been a romantic partner.”

What is most shocking about this revelation is that we constantly blame evil anti-Semites for calling Jews like Weinstein 'bloodsucking vampires' and tell them to stop using such medieval 'blood libels' against this much maligned ethnic group. But then Harvey goes and ruins it all by literally sucking on the blood of one of his victims. 

SPAIN DEAD AS CATALAN MPS DECLARE INDEPENDENCE

Stick a fork in it! Spain, as we have known it for centuries, is now done.

Viva Catalonia! Viva Castille!

This historic event follows a vote by Catalonia's regional parliament to declare full independence on the back of a referendum in the region that strongly supported independence. The referendum, which had a 43% turnout, voted for independence by 92%. Now in a vote on Friday (27th Oct.) Catalan MPs have voted 70 to 10 in favour of independence, with 55 abstaining. 

While many people in Catalonia are still in favour of union with Spain, clearly a majority with an opinion on the matter support independence. But more importantly the Spanish government of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has managed to inflame passions and polarise people by its attempt at heavy-handed repression.

I'm not saying repression can't work. It definitely can, but in order to work, it needs to be implemented by someone like this:

Not someone like this:

In response to the vote by the Catalan parliament, the Spanish senate has granted powers to Rajoy to impose direct rule on the region under article 155 of the Spanish constitution. But this too will only inflame the situation. In fact, the more Rajoy tries to clamp down on the independence movement by using force and imprisoning people, the more martyrs he will create, thus further inflaming the situation.

The Catalonian situation presents a fascinating case of how weak liberal democracies really are in the face of strong popular uprisings, even amongst localised parts of their population. At the end of the day power is about passion, and Rajoy's actions have basically ensured that the Catalan independence movement will have this in spades. 

What will happen from now is this: the national security forces will attempt to clamp down, but instead of dealing with a few troublemakers they will be dealing with hundreds of thousands on the streets and will thus be essentially overwhelmed, and forced to cede control of parts of the state to the independence movement.

The continuing division will also cause economic disruption with no clear solution outside of doing a deal, while the only possible deal on the table now involves independence. 

If Rajoy had taken a less confrontational approach and shown the Catalan people more respect, it might have been possible to cobble together some deal that kept them in Spain, but going in hard has ruined the chances of this.

Rajoy is essentially LARPing as Franco, a man who literally decreed that all Spanish universities should be built so that police horses could ride through their corridors, but unfortunately for Rajoy no one is convinced by his tough guy act. This is because 'to be Franco' you have to be prepared to bust heads, clear the streets with gunfire, and then round up as many people as you need to. There is no way that a European liberal democracy can operate in this way, so there is zero chance of Rajoy's actions panning out in the way he hopes.

Now Rajoy has dissolved the Catalan parliament and called for fresh elections. This is unlikely to produce a pro-union majority. The independence campaign has two options -- to run in these elections or to boycott them. If they run they will probably win, but if they boycott they will probably win too.

Whether you want it or not, independence is coming to Catalonia, and after Catalonia, who knows what other identitarian forces will be unleashed in Europe?

THE GIANT AWAKENS: MOST WHITES FEEL RACIALLY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST

A new poll has revealed that the majority of White Americans now believe their group is being racially discriminated against. The poll -- released by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health -- found that 55% of those surveyed agreed withe the idea that, generally speaking, there is discrimination against white people in America today. 

The fact is that there has been systemic racial discrimination against White people for several decades, through open borders racial replacement policies, feminism and dysgenic birth policies, 'affirmative action' and racial quotas, the destruction of White monuments and the demonisation of White history, and the promotion of White guilt narratives by a hostile cultural elite. But now it seems that Whites are finally 'woke.' 

A sleeping GIANT is arising but still remains rather groggy as a large number -- 45% -- still refuse to believe in the ongoing racist campaign against Whites in general. Indeed, many Whites seem reluctant to believe that their group is being gradually marginalised and eliminated.

Partly this is because of brainwashing and propaganda by globalist elites, but also it is because Whites don't like to think of themselves as victims. When faced by racial persecution, most Whites simply try to suck it up and overcome the setbacks, or else simply move to a job or a town where they can temporarily escape the rising tide of anti-White racism. 

This is revealed in other figures uncovered by the poll. While 55% of Whites now believe that their group is being racially discriminated against, much smaller percentages believe they have been personally discriminated against, with only 19% believing that they have been discriminated against when applying for jobs; 13% believing they have been unfairly paid or passed over for promotion; and 11% believing they have been discriminated against in higher education. 

'If you apply for a job, they seem to give the blacks the first crack at it,' said Tim Hershman of Akron, Ohio, one of those interviewed in the survey. 'Basically, you know, if you want any help from the government, if you're white, you don't get it. If you're black, you get it.'

Some Whites who still believe Whites are not discriminated against base it on the much higher rates of White achievement, pretending that these stem from social inequality rather then superior talent

'I don't see how we can be discriminated against when, when we have all the power,' Betty Holton, a retired community college English teacher said. 'I don't see how we can be discriminated against when, when we have all the power. Look at Congress. Look at the Senate. Look at government on every level. Look at the leadership in corporations. Look. Look anywhere.'

Of course, such naive views are increasingly sliding into the dustbin of history. White working class people who see their neighbourhoods ruined, their wages pushed down, and who are subjected to interracial crime certainly don't feel they have 'all the power.' To this group only the Alt-Right holds out hope, or a genuine strain of American nationalism of the sort that Trump tapped into during the 2016 election campaign but has yet to deliver on.

WELL, THAT'S NICE (1): AIDS TRACK COACH FACES 216 KIDDY DIDDLING CHARGES

With an angel face like that why would he ever have been suspected?

Do people running schools even bother to check if the kids are being regularly raped? TL;DR: No.

From Newsweek:

'A HIV-positive man who worked in schools in Maryland is facing new charges of sexual assault against underage students, bringing his total count to 206.

Carlos Deangelo Bell, 32 and of Waldorf, Maryland, was served with the 206-count indictment in court on Friday.

The charges span a period of two years—from May 2015 to June 2017—and include 42 alleged victims, 28 of whom have been identified and 14 of whom have not, who were between 11 and 17 years old at the time of the offenses, according to a statement from the Charles County State’s Attorney Office.'

Really, why would this even bother you unless you were an evil racist bigot who hates people with AIDS? 

It doesn't bother me. Why should it? This kind of shit happens all the time, so no biggie, and anyway it's mainly caused by us having an internet. If we just didn't have an internet none of this would be happening.

APPARENTLY CHICAGO HAS A RAT PROBLEM

Chicago now has another 'Feather of Shame' to stick in its 'Cap of Humiliation' as it has been named the US's leading RAT CITY for the third year in a row by Orkin the pest control company that uses the list to market its exterminationist services.

Most cities, when they decline, are said to 'go to the dogs,' but a more accurate expression would be 'go to the rats' because as cities decline, inevitably the rats move in. 

This is because declining cities become crime-ridden and welfare dependent hellholes, characterised by dirty, slovenly people, lots of nutritious garbage, and dilapidated buildings in which rats flourish and find what experts term 'hidey holes.' 

This stage of decline lasts up until a true state of nature reasserts itself, when the rat numbers are then curtailed by a decline in human-generated garbage and an influx of natural predators like large snakes and various wild members of the feline species. 

Right now Chicago is going through the 'rat phase,' which may be why the present mayor Rahm Emanuel has a first name that almost sounds like 'Rat' and actually looks a bit like a long-tailed, disease-carrying rodent. 

However, despite his rat-like appearance and the possibility that he might even be 'hoist on his own petard,' Mayor Emanuel is committed to killing as many rats as possible. On Friday the 13th earlier this month, Emanuel proposed spending an additional $1.5 million in fiscal year 2018 to solve the rat problem.

The extra funds would allow the city to increase the number of mobile rat-killing crews from 25 to 30. In 2016 the city only had 8 such crews. 

In order to escape Rahm Emanuel's death squads some rats have been resorting to changing their names and identities.

Emanuel also asked the city for another $500,000 to buy 10,000 black garbage carts to replace those gnawed through by the city's exploding rat population. Rats' front teeth grow 4 to 5 inches each year, so that the rats have to wear them down by continuously gnawing on everything around them, including plastic, cement, bricks, wood, and lead pipes.

Figures show that the city had 39,000 rat complaints in 2017, up 30% on 2016. This means that the increase in 'rat death squads' is barely keeping pace with the surge in the rat population. 

Killing the rats is also starting to raise ethical dilemmas, with animal rights activists complaining about the demonisation of rats and 'cruel methods of killing.'

Originally, city authorities were putting up posters like this, clearly reminiscent of the style of the German 1930s periodical Der Stürmer to stir up irrational hatred of the rats:

The posters also served to warn children not to eat the tendies that had been laced with rat poison and left out to kill the rats. But, after complaints from animal rights groups, the city decided to change the design to something less 'specieist' and alarming:

There is no data yet on whether this has led to a rise in human food poisoning incidents. 

There was also controversy about the methods used to kill the rats, after the City tried a 'pilot program' using dry ice in 2016. After locating rat burrows, the extermination squads sealed off as many exits as possible, using dirt and newspapers, then put dry ice into the remaining rat hole and sealed it. This essentially created a mini gas chamber because the dry ice -- frozen carbon dioxide -- evaporated into a gas that then suffocated the trapped rats, which were then left to decompose or be eaten by new rats. 

At the time Mayor Emanuel was extremely positive about the new method, calling it 'smarter and more effective,' but the project had to be stopped when city officials learned that it had not been approved by the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

But killing the rats in this way or any other is likely to have a limited effect, because rats can breed extremely fast. Rats reach sexual maturity aged just 4 or 5 weeks, and the female rat has six litters a year, with up to 12 rat pups in each litter. This means that a population can swell from two rats to well over a 1,000 in a single year. 

As long as the conditions for rat growth increase -- a dysfunctional, welfare-dependent population with poor hygiene, living in dilapidated buildings with plenty of garbage -- then the rat population is set to continue to grow. 

In fact, killing them at a faster rate will only accelerate their evolution, ultimately creating a race of super rats immune to our poisons. Looking at this picture of Rahm Emanuel, I wonder if we haven't been here before.